still in vogue in the early part of this century (1903) in India, where M. D. Gibson observed it and proposed an interpretation of this parable on the basis of it. Her interpretation was supported by others (see ESBNT 174 n. 23) and was eventually bolstered by ancient evidence gathered by J. D. M. Derrett (see BIBLIOGRAPHY). The same custom seems to be known also in later rabbinic texts in which casuistry solved the problem of reconciling this practice with the prohibition of usury or interest in
Page 1098